Projects
Benefits of Black Liquor
Gasification
An External Benefits Study of Black Liquor
Gasification
Background
In the process of breaking down wood into fiber for making paper
products, approximately half of the mass of the wood is converted
into usable fiber. The other half, along with an equal amount of
spent caustic cooking chemicals, forms a byproduct known as black
liquor. The organic content is sufficient to make it a low-grade
fuel. The current practice is to burn the liquor in specialized
boilers to recover energy in the form of steam, and to recover the
cooking chemicals in the form of molten salt. After a substantial
amount of re processing, the salt is returned to a form where it
can be reused in the cooking process. The steam can be used
elsewhere in the mill or in a steam turbine to produce
electricity.
Approximately 240 million tons of black liquor are produced each
year in pulp production world wide (a). The value of the recovered
caustic (sodium hydroxide) is about US$26 Billion. The fuel value
is equivalent to about 460 million barrels of crude oil, which is
worth about US$8.3 Billion. The sum of these values is US$34.3
Billion. The corresponding pulp produced is worth about US$74
Billion.
Recovery boilers have been in use since the 1930's. They have
become progressively more sophisticated over the decades, but they
are still quite thermally inefficient compared to coal or gas fired
power producing boilers. Clearly, incremental improvements in
efficiency will lead to significant cost savings.
Gasifying the black liquor resolves a number of problems while
introducing some synergistic benefits as well. The first is in the
generation of electricity. Gasification is effectively partial
oxidation of the hydrocarbons in any given fuel. The product gas
(or syn gas) is a mixture of CO2, CO, H2O, and H2, which, after
suitable polishing, can be burned in a gas turbine to produce
electricity. The hot exhaust gas from the turbine is then passed
through a heat exchanger to produce steam for a power producing
steam turbine. The use of both types of turbines is known as
combined cycle operation. Since gas turbines are thermally more
efficient than steam turbines, gasification combined cycle
operation can generate more electricity than combustion given the
same fuel. In the case of black liquor, the increase is potentially
sufficient to make an integrated pulp and paper mill into a net
exporter of electricity.
Another benefit is in the inherent separation of sulfur and
sodium during BLG. In the conventional recovery boiler, all of the
sulfur leaves with the molten smelt as Na2S. In BLG, the gas will
contain most or all of the sulfur (depending on the particular
gasification process chosen), while the sodium leaves with the
smelt phase. There are a number of advanced variants to the kraft
pulping process which will increase pulp yield but require varying
degrees of sulfur/sodium separation. Since this is a natural
consequence of BLG, it lends itself to implementation of these
high-yield processes:
- Polysulfide/Enhanced Polysulfide offers as much as 4% increase
in bleached pulp
- Split Sulfidity offers a 1-2% increase
- Alkaline Sulfite Anthroquinone offers as much as 8% on linerboard
and 4% on bleached pulp.
A third benefit of BLG is the potential for in situ
causticization within the gasifier. In the conventional recovery
cycle, sulfate must be reduced to sulfide, and carbonate must be
causticized to hydroxide. The sulfur reduction occurs in the char
bed in the boiler, but the caustization is a separate (and costly)
step known as the lime cycle. The sodium carbonate is reacted with
calcium oxide to produce sodium hydroxide and calcium carbonate.
The calcium carbonate is then burned in large rotating kilns to
form carbon dioxide and calcium oxide. Lime kilns have been used by
the paper industry since the 1920's. A 1000 ton per day pulp mill
will use about 100,000 barrels of fuel oil per year to fire its
lime kiln. Through novel chemistries it may be possible to carry
out the causticization reactions directly within a black liquor
gasifier. This would eliminate the need for the lime cycle and the
associated fossil fuel to fire it.
Other incentives for BLG include reduced emissions of sulfur
dioxide, carbon monoxide, VOC's, and particulates. There is also
the safety aspect of eliminating smelt-water explosions through the
elimination of the char bed itself.
Several techno-economic and feasibility studies [1]-[8] reach a
general consensus that the capital costs of a BLG Combined Cycle
(BLGCC) operation are much higher than a conventional recovery
boiler yet electric power generation more than doubles. Since more
than 125 recovery boilers in North America will exceed useful life
in the next 10-15 years, these boilers can be replaced with more
profitable gasifiers if well-identified technical hurdles can be
overcome in the interim. However these studies have focused on the
cost savings and increased power generation potential of BLG. To
date there has not been a thorough assessment of the overall
benefits and drawbacks of BLG on the community. Such a study is
proposed here.
(a) Production estimates for the U.S. alone were not immediately
available at the time of this writing.
Goal
The overall goal would be a comprehensive study of the external
benefits/impacts of black liquor gasifiers replacing conventional
recovery boilers in the pulping industry. Previous studies have
focused only on direct cost savings as an accounting exercise -
industry feasibility per se. This study would elucidate
the broader societal, environmental, labor, and energy related
benefits of BLG.
References
[1] Larson, E.D., McDonald, G.W., Yang, W., Frederick, W.J.,
Iisa, K., Kreutz T.G., Malcolm, E.W., Brown, C.A., "A Cost-Benefit
Assessment of Black Liquor Gasifier/Combined Cycle Technology
Integrated into a Krafty Pulp Mill", International Chemical
Recovery Conference, Tampa, FL, 1998
[2] Larson, E.D., Raymond, D.R., "Commercializing Black Liquor
and Biomass Gasifier/Gas Turbine Technology", TAPPI J., 12, 1997
p50
[3] McKeough, P.J., Arpiainen, T., Makinen, T., Solantausta, Y.,
"Black Liquor Gasification: Down-stream Processes, Plant
Performances and Costs", International Chemical Recovery
Conference, Toronto, CA 1995
[4] Isaksson, A., Andren, M., Ahlroth, M., Yan, J., Svedberg,
G., "Energy Consequences when Integrating a Black Liquor Gasifier
into a Pulp Mill"
[5] Brooks, T.B., Marcinek, F.T., "Emerging and Underutilized
Technologies to Increase Kraft Mill Production", TAPPI Engineering
Conference, 1996
[6] Berglin, N., Andersson, L., "Process Integration of Black
Liquor Gasifiers for Incremental Recovery Capacity", International
Chemical Recovery Conference, Whistler, BC, 2001
[7] Nasholm, A.S., Westermark, M., "Energy Studies of Different
Cogeneration Systems for Black Liquor Gasification", Energy
Convers. Mgmt. 38:15-17, p1655, 1997
[8] Grace, T.M., Timmer, W.M., "A Comparison of Alternative
Black Liquor Recovery Technologies", International Chemical
Recovery Conference, Toronto, Ontario, CA 1995
[9] Ryham, R., "Black Liquor: A Man-Made Fuel", International
Chemical Recovery Conference, Whistler, BC, 2001
|